Articles Posted in Probate Disputes

It is a classic scenario – the evil step-mother taking everything when her husband dies even though his children were expecting an inheritance. What do you do if someone swoops your inheritance, or your expectation of an inheritance, out from under you? Florida recognizes a cause of action for tortious interference with an inheritance or expectancy of such. See In re Estate of Hatten, 880 So. 2d 1271 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2004). This means that if an inheritance or the expectancy of an inheritance is diverted, destroyed, or something of the like by a third party, there is a cause of action by which the person who did not receive the expected inheritance may be compensated.

Tortious interference with inheritance is defined as, “[o]ne who by fraud, duress or other tortious means intentionally prevents another from receiving from a third person an inheritance or gift that he would otherwise have received is subject to liability to the other for loss of the inheritance or gift.” Restatement (Second) of Torts § 774B. There can also be many related causes of action to a tortuous interference with inheritance claim, such as breach of contract, undue influence, and unjust enrichment. A person who has been the victim of such wrongful conduct may bring an action for a constructive trust or damages.
Continue Reading

As people progress through different stages of their lives, their beliefs and objectives sometimes fluctuate and change. One situation in which an individual may change his or her mind is when writing a will. People often change their minds about whom to devise or bequest their property. But, what causes people to change their minds? What if someone revokes their will based on a mistaken assumption of law or fact? Is the new will effective? Does the old will get revived if the new will is ineffective?

Over the years, courts have wrestled with such questions and, resultantly, have come up with the doctrine of dependent relative revocation (“DRR”). Essentially, the courts have decided that if a testator claims to revoke his will, and he or she does so based on a mistaken assumption of law or fact, the revocation is invalid if the testator would not have revoked the initial will had he known the truth. Once it is clear to the court that the revocation of the prior will was based upon the validity of the new will, the court will apply DRR. The doctrine creates a “rebuttable presumption that the testator would have preferred to revive his earlier . . . bequests rather than let the property go by intestacy.” In re Estate of Pratt, 88 So. 2d 499, 501 (Fla. 1956).
Continue Reading

According to Florida Statute § 732.501, any person who is of sound mind and legal age (at least 18 years old or emancipated) can make a will. Florida is home to an eclectic and wide ranging group of people, especially in Miami, Ft. Lauderdale, and Palm Beach. However, not every one of its adults or emancipated minors is qualified to make a will that would later be enforceable. Those lacking a sound mind, otherwise known as incapacited, may have their wills challenged by effected beneficiaries.

So what exactly is a sound mind? Florida courts have held that several behaviors could disqualify a person from making a valid will. For instance, an individual suffering from alcohol or drug addiction, mental weakness, illness, or old age may not be able to create an enforceable will; yet the presence of such condition(s) alone is not enough to invalidate a will. The residing probate court will enforce the will if the testator (creator of the will) had sufficient wherewithall and memory to understand the consequences of his/her action at the time the will was executed. If the substance abuse or condition impaired one’s mental capacity to comprehend the consequences of a will, then the court may not enforce it.

Courts will determine the mental capacity of the testator on a case by case basis to see whether there was indeed a lack of capacity. The mental state of the testator is determined at the time the will is created and executed, not the time subsequent. Thus, if Aunt Lucile created a will and then developed a drug problem, a court would likely enforce the will after a finding that she was not mentally incapable at the time she made the will.

Even the most carefully crafted wills may someday need to be altered or revoked entirely in order to adapt to the changes in one’s life. There are three mechanisms provided by the Florida Probate Code that revoke a will: (1) by written instrument, (2) by physical act, or (3) by operation of law. These apply throughout the state of Florida, including West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale and Miami.

The ideal method of revocation is outlined in Florida Statute 732.505, which provides that a will can be revoked by executing another will, codicil, or other written document expressly declaring the intent to revoke a previous will. Additionally, any terms in a subsequent will revoke provisions of a previous will to the extent that they are inconsistent. Because it provides more precision and certainty over the other two methods, this method is the preferred means of revoking a will. However, because any such instrument must be executed with the same formalities as a will itself, one should always consult with a skilled attorney to ensure that the true intent of the testator is realized.

Florida Statute 732.506 allows a testator to revoke a will by burning, tearing, canceling, defacing, obliterating, or otherwise destroying the original copy. This method is not at all encouraged, as it must also be shown that the will was destroyed with the intent, and for the purpose, of revocation. Unless one destroys their will, for example, in the middle of a crowded football stadium while clearly declaring their intent to the revoke the will, it will always be a challenge during the probate process to prove intent to revoke. Thus, this self-help method should only rarely be employed and one should instead consult with a professional.

Florida has very strict time restrictions as to when a creditor can file a claim against an estate, and if the deadline passes they are likely barred from the claim.

To start the process, the personal representative is charged with the duty of publishing notice to all creditors that the decedent has passed away. Publishing notice means that the personal representative must document this prescribed notice in a countywide newspaper once a week for two consecutive weeks. Such notice can be accomplished by publishing it in a major Miami or Fort Lauderdale newspaper.

If a creditor seeks a claim against the estate, the creditor’s statement of claim must then be filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court within three months of the date of the first notice published by the personal representative. If the creditor is late in filing, then the claim will likely be barred.

Super Lawyers
Florida Legal Elite 2018
Super Lawyers 10 Years
Super Lawyers 5 Years
Avvo Rating
AV Preeminent
Super Lawyers Top 100 Miami
Circle of Excellence 2024
Contact Information